Osama and 9/11
On the morning of September 11, 2001, within hours of planes hitting the towers, we were sold a story of how the attacks bore an uncanny resemblance to previous terrorist attacks carried out by Osama bin Laden. The two primary examples given to validate such a claim were the bombings of three embassies in 1998 and the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. Neither were carried out by flying airplanes into anything, and meanwhile, bin Laden, who supposedly readily claimed responsibility for these acts, was issuing statements denying his involvement in 9/11. So exactly how did we conclude within a couple of hours that this was a “classic textbook” bin Laden tactic?
CIA Involvement In Libya
A member of the Italian special forces had gone public with the fact that mercenaries and special forces members from around the world had been coordinated by NATO to give the appearance that the Libyan people were rebelling. Here’s an article from Global Research dating back to January of this year that gives more information on that story:
The Playbook, Business as Usual
We have seen the CIA’s influence in 1953, with the assassination of Mossadeqh, in 1954 in Guatemala, in the late 50s and early 60s in Cuba, culminating in the Bay of Pigs, in 1963 in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was one of the military officers that the CIA collaborated with to overthrow Qasim, to install a government more friendly to American interests.
We also saw their influence in Chile in 1973 (the date of the day that the CIA sponsored attacks began on the democratically elected government of Chile? September 11, 1973!!). In July 1979, the US Government sponsored and fomented the rebellion in Nicaragua in the early 80s, while getting caught with their pants down trading illegally with both Iran and Nicaraguan, then Panama in 1989, etc.., ad nauseum…
My main point here, obviously, is that all the evidence that most Americans & allies needed to believe that Osama bin Laden was the mastermind of 9/11 was the mention of two terrorist attacks that were not similar in nature to the attacks of 9/11. Meanwhile, we have all too many references for the CIA’s “trademark” or “classic textbook” destruction of countries disguised as “rebellions”, and many still don’t believe that the CIA is responsible for fomenting all of the unrest that we see in the Middle East.
With the people and the police of Libya joining forces to drive out the “Islamist militia” installed by UN and NATO forces, in my opinion, I think that we can clearly see that the CIA and the State Department backed the rebellion and installed a puppet regime, while once again claiming that a legitimate rebellion was taking place against a vilified leader, Qaddafi:
Libya: Islamist militia bases stormed in Benghazi
Libya enjoyed some of the highest standards of living for its people in the region, and it could be argued, the world. Here is a video that explains in further detail how Qaddafi always tried to speak truth to the US/UN/NATO lies and how that, coupled with the fact that he was suggesting a switch from the US dollar for oil trade currency, led to a US initiative for his assassination:
How much longer will we let the CIA, Washington, and the media kill people at will and blame it on other groups?!? We’d all better start uniting and standing up now, Amerika, before it is too late!!!